McSkulin v. McLaren Health Care Corporation
| Jamie McSkulin |
| McLaren Health Care Corporation |
| 2:2023cv12535 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Anthony P Patti |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy J. Lowe on behalf of McLaren Health Care Corporation. (Lowe, Timothy) |
Filing 7
ORDER Prohibiting Filings in this Action Until Further Order of the Court. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Cheryl Drugich re #5 Notice (Other) Notice Of Filing Plaintiff Drugichs Motion To Consolidate Cases And Appoint The Miller Law Firm, P.C., Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC, And Shub & Johns LLC As Interim Lead Co-Counsel (Corrected as to docket entry and filer) (Miller, E.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Jamie McSkulin Plaintiffs Joint Motion To Consolidate Cases and Appointment of The Miller Law Firm, P.C. as Interim Lead Counsel (Miller, E.) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. McLaren Health Care Corporation served on 10/9/2023, answer due 10/30/2023. (Ferich, Andrew) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Bernard A. Friedman and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti to District Judge Matthew F. Leitman and Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *McLaren Health Care Corporation* (MCho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jamie McSkulin against McLaren Health Care Corporation with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9517344 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Tuscola County - County Where Action Arose: Genesee County - County of 1st Defendant: Genesee County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 4:23-cv-12520-MFL-CI, Judge Hon. Matthew F. Leitman] (Ferich, Andrew) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (MCho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McSkulin v. McLaren Health Care Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamie McSkulin | |
| Represented By: | Andrew W Ferich |
| Represented By: | E. Powell Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: McLaren Health Care Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Lowe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
