Gordon et al v. City of Hamtramck et al
| Russ Gordon and Cathy Stackpoole |
| Hamtramck, City of, Hamtramck City Council and Amer Ghalib |
| 2:2023cv12812 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| David M Lawson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses Answer to Amended Complaint by Amer Ghalib, Hamtramck City Council, Hamtramck, City of. (Odetalla, Odetalla) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Amer Ghalib, Hamtramck City Council, Hamtramck, City of. (Odetalla, Odetalla) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, #13 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct #11 Order on #5 Amended Document. Motion Hearing set for 3/13/2024 at 3:00 PM before District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST by All Plaintiffs. (Susselman, Marc) Modified on 12/12/2023 (LGra). [WRONG EVENT USED DOCUMENT IS TITLED: PLAINTIFFS AMENDED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION] Modified on 12/12/2023 (LGra). |
| Filing 13 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct #11 Order on Motion - Free, #5 Amended Document by All Plaintiffs. (Susselman, Marc) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Amended Document by All Plaintiffs (Susselman, Marc) |
Filing 11
ORDER Denying Motions #7 and #9 . Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 1/23/2024 at 10:00 AM before District Judge David M. Lawson. See image for document deadline. (SPin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for summary judgment by All Plaintiffs. (Susselman, Marc) |
| Filing 8 [Motion] APPLICATION by All Plaintiffs. (Susselman, Marc) Modified on 12/7/2023 (MCho). |
| Filing 7 MOTION summary judgment re #5 Amended Document by All Plaintiffs. (Susselman, Marc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Odey K. Meroueh on behalf of All Defendants. (Meroueh, Odey) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED #1 Complaint,, by All Plaintiffs (Susselman, Marc) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Summons Issued by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation, #2 Document Continuation) (Susselman, Marc) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (MCho) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Civil Covwe Sheet filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Susselman, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Exhibits filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9552099 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Susselman, Marc) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (MCho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
