Kim Thomas v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Kim Thomas
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC and Synchrony Bank
Case Number: 2:2023cv12831
Filed: November 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Sean F Cox
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan S. Bolton on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Bolton, Jordan)
January 3, 2024 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Statement of Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations by Synchrony Bank Amended (Taylor, Alan)
January 3, 2024 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses Amended by Synchrony Bank. (Taylor, Alan)
January 3, 2024 Filing 8 [PER COUNSEL - INCORRECT DATE, TO BE REFILED] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Statement of Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations by Synchrony Bank (Taylor, Alan) Modified on 1/3/2024 (JMcC).
January 3, 2024 Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Synchrony Bank identifying Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Synchrony Bank. (Taylor, Alan)
January 3, 2024 Filing 6 [PER COUNSEL - INCORRECT DATE, TO BE REFILED] ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Synchrony Bank. (Taylor, Alan) Modified on 1/3/2024 (JMcC). Modified on 1/3/2024 (JMcC).
November 15, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alan J. Taylor on behalf of Synchrony Bank. (Taylor, Alan)
November 15, 2023 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Synchrony Bank waiver sent on 11/7/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. (Schwartz, Carl)
November 13, 2023 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Equifax Information Services, LLC waiver sent on 11/7/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. (Schwartz, Carl)
November 7, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (MCho)
November 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kim Thomas against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Synchrony Bank with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9554087 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Schwartz, Carl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim Thomas v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Thomas
Represented By: Carl Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Represented By: Jordan S. Bolton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Represented By: Alan J. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?