Barton et al v. General Motor LLC et al
| Natalie Barton, Jeannie Brazell, Lea Compton, Lauren Huse, Daniel Kashdan, Bruce Lynch, Stephen Mathias, Thadyus Moore, Anne Sanchez, Russell Snyder, Jennifer Yamazawa and Billy Yeargin |
| General Motor LLC, DOES 1 through 100 and John Doe |
| 2:2023cv12920 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *General Motor LLC* (MCho) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (MCho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9563288 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Marchbanks, Steve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
