Freudiger et al v. General Motors LLC et al
| Donald Freudiger, Thomas Walsh and Daniel Williams |
| General Motors LLC, DOES 1 through 100 and John Doe |
| 2:2023cv12921 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Vacating #3 Order to Show Cause. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Marchbanks, Steve) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Plaintiffs to Show Cause why this Court should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 12/11/2023. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *General Motors LLC* (LGra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9563291 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Marchbanks, Steve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
