Carrington v. Detroit Buildings Safety Engineering and Environment Department et al
Derak Terrall Carrington |
Detroit Buildings Safety Engineering and Environment Department, Homrich Wrecking, Incorporated Doing business as Homrich 4 Detroit and Detroit Land Bank Cummunity Dev Corporation |
2:2023cv12978 |
November 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Gershwin A Drain |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summonses Provided to Plaintiff(s) for Service (SSch) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *Detroit Buildings Safety Engineering and Environment Department, Detroit Land Bank Cummunity Dev Corporation, Homrich Wrecking, Incorporated* (SSch) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Fee Paid on 12/6/23 Receipt No. 150008164 by Derak Terrall Carrington [Submitted through Pro Se Portal] (SSch) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MCho) |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 12/6/2023 (SSch) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Derak Terrall Carrington against Detroit Buildings Safety Engineering and Environment Department, Detroit Land Bank Cummunity Dev Corporation, Homrich Wrecking, Incorporated [Submitted through Pro Se Portal] (SSch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.