Jock v. Michigan Department of Health & Human Services et al
| Joseph Lawrence Jock, Jr. |
| Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, St. Clair County Friend of the Court, Ronald Kaski, Cynthia A. Lane, Hillory Eagon, Caryn Vanderheuvel, Edward V. Messing, Jr. and Daniel Dammon |
| 2:2023cv13054 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Nancy G Edmunds |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION and ORDER Granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Dismissing #1 Complaint - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Opinion & Order, #6 Judgment on Joseph Lawrence Jock, Jr at 4760 Griswold, Kimball, MI 48074. (LBar)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (DJen)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Joseph Lawrence Jock, Jr. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Lawrence Jock, Jr against Daniel Dammon, Hillory Eagon, Ronald Kaski, Cynthia A. Lane, Edward V. Messing, Jr, Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, St. Clair County Friend of the Court, Caryn Vanderheuvel (DAll)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
