Bingham v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC et al
NaKiesha Bingham |
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A and Credit One Bank, N.A. |
2:2023cv13155 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Stephen J Murphy |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Credit One Bank, N.A. waiver sent on 1/4/2024, answer due 3/4/2024. (Bradley, Jacob) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Credit One Bank, N.A. (Bradley, Jacob) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Bradley on behalf of Credit One Bank, N.A.. (Bradley, Jacob) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Equifax Information Services, LLC waiver sent on 1/2/2024, answer due 3/4/2024. (Schwartz, Carl) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Equifax Information Services, LLC* (NAhm) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Credit One Bank, N.A.* (NAhm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by NaKiesha Bingham against CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9589164 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Schwartz, Carl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.