Skank v. Internal Revenue Service et al
| Prescilla Skank |
| Internal Revenue Service, Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of and Social Security Administration |
| 2:2023cv13190 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Taxes |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to report and recommendation (not on docket) by Prescilla Skank. (DPer) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT to clarify billing error, to void claim of debt, to stop retaliation-based bullying and for other relief filed by Prescilla Skank. (DPer) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (RLou) |
Filing 5
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Paurperis and Dismissing the #1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (RLou)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Judgment, #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Prescilla Skank, at 199 N. State Road, PO Box 23, Otisville, MI 48463 (RLou) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MCho) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Prescilla Skank. (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Prescilla Skank against All Defendants. (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
