HOP Plaintiffs v. Liblang et al
| HOP Plaintiffs |
| Dani K. Liblang and Liblang Law Firm |
| 2:2023mc50768 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #1 INITIATING MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena and Brief in Support by HOP Plaintiffs. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9311475 - Fee: 49 dollars. Motion Hearing set for 6/29/2023 AT 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (MarW) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by HOP Plaintiffs of withdrawal of #10 MOTION to Transfer Case . (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - [In Chambers] Order Striking Notice of Lien [Dkt. No 1321], filed in the USDC, Central District of California on May 16, 2023, #3 Exhibit B - Declaration of Eric D. Pearson, #4 Exhibit C - Letter to Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson from Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen, dated May 18, 2023, #5 Exhibit D - Email correspondence between attorneys, Eric D. Pearson and Kenneth M. Mogill dated May 24, 2023 through May 25, 2023) (Miller, Charles) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #10 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Mogill, Kenneth) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Transfer Case by HOP Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Eric D. Pearson, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration - Notice of Attorneys Lien filed in the USDC, Central District of California on September 14, 2022, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration - Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action dated March 8, 2023, #5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration - Letter to Charles W. Miller, Heygood, Orr & Pearson from Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen, dated March 22, 2023, #6 Exhibit 4 to Declaration - Plaintiffs Notice of Motion and Motion to Adjudicate Lien filed in the USDC, Central District of California on April 7, 2023, #7 Exhibit 5 to Declaration - Defendant Ford Motor Companys Status Conference Report regarding all DPS6 MDL Cases (First Quarterly Report) filed in the USDC, Central District of California on May 4, 2023, #8 Proposed Order) (Miller, Charles) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by HOP Plaintiffs (Pearson, Eric) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response re #1 INITIATING MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena and Brief in Support by HOP Plaintiffs. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9311475 - Fee: 49 dollars filed by HOP Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Eric D. Pearson, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration - Letter to Charles W. Miller, Heygood, Orr & Pearson from Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen, dated March 22, 2023, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration - Letter to Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson from Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen, dated April 7, 2023, #5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration - Notice of Attorneys Lien filed in the USDC, Central District of California on September 14, 2022, #6 Exhibit 4 to Declaration - Notice of Designation of Lead Counsel, Eric D. Pearson, filed in the USDC, Central District of California on July 27, 2022, #7 Exhibit 5 to Declaration - Letter to Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen from Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson, dated March 30, 2023, #8 Exhibit 6 to Declaration - Spreadsheet of CAMDL Plaintiffs, #9 Exhibit 7 to Declaration - Consumer Fraud and/or Warranty Representation Agreement, #10 Exhibit 8 to Declaration - Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees, Costs, and Expenses filed in the USDC, Central District of California on August 13, 2020, #11 Exhibit 9 to Declaration - Civil Minutes General filed in the USDC, Central District of California on July 22, 2021, #12 Exhibit 10 to Declaration - Dani K. Liblangs communication to former clients dated January 27, 2017) (Miller, Charles) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Ribiat on behalf of HOP Plaintiffs. (Ribiat, Steven) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 INITIATING MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena and Brief in Support by HOP Plaintiffs. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9311475 - Fee: 49 dollars with Certificate of Service filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Dani K. Liblang, #3 Exhibit B - Hearing Transcript Page, #4 Exhibit C - Order of 12/18/2020, #5 Exhibit D - Fee Splitting Agreement 12/14/2017, #6 Exhibit E - Client Ltr 11/23/2021, #7 Exhibit F - Client Ltr 2/25/2022, #8 Exhibit G - Client Ltr 4/19/2022, #9 Exhibit H - Ltr to Eric Pearson 4/7/2023) (Seikaly, William) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: William R. Seikaly appearing on behalf of All Defendants with Certificate of Service (Seikaly, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David H. Fink on behalf of Dani K. Liblang, Liblang Law Firm. (Fink, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth M. Mogill on behalf of All Defendants. (Mogill, Kenneth) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #1 INITIATING MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena and Brief in Support by HOP Plaintiffs. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 1 INITIATING MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena and Brief in Support by HOP Plaintiffs. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9311475 - Fee: 49 dollars (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Kenneth Stern, #3 Exhibit 1 to Stern Declaration - Co-Counsel Agreement dated December 21, 2016, #4 Exhibit 2 to Stern Declaration - Consumer Fraud and/or Warranty Representation Agreement, #5 Exhibit 3 to Stern Declaration - Fee Split Agreement Michigan Mass Action Cases dated December 15, 2017, #6 Exhibit 4 to Stern Declaration - Settlement Agreement dated March 2, 2022, #7 Exhibit 5 to Stern Declaration - State of Michigan Court of Appeals Opinion dated December 26, 2019, #8 Exhibit 6 to Stern Declaration - State of Michigan, Circuit Court of Wayne County Order Dismissing Count V and the Claims of All Non-Michigan Plaintiffs dated April 26, 2022, #9 Exhibit 7 to Stern Declaration - Termination and Fee Agreement, #10 Exhibit 8 to Stern Declaration - Termination and Fee Agreement, #11 Exhibit 9 to Stern Declaration - Termination and Fee Agreement, #12 Exhibit 10 to Stern Declaration - Notice of Attorneys Lien dated September 14, 2022, #13 Exhibit B - Declaration of Eric D. Pearson, #14 Exhibit 1 to Pearson Declaration - Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, #15 Exhibit 2 to Pearson Declaration - Letter to Charles W. Miller, Heygood, Orr & Pearson from Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen, dated March 22, 2023, #16 Exhibit 3 to Pearson Declaration - Letter to Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen from Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson, dated March 23, 2023, #17 Exhibit 4 to Pearson Declaration - Letter to Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen from Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson, dated March 30, 2023, #18 Exhibit 5 to Pearson Declaration - Letter to Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen from Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson, dated April 6, 2023, #19 Exhibit 6 to Pearson Declaration - Letter to Kenneth M. Mogill, Mogill, Posner & Cohen from Eric D. Pearson, Heygood, Orr & Pearson, dated April 10, 2023, #20 [Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena, #21 Unpublished Authorities) (Pearson, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
