Sammour v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Ebtisam T. Sammour |
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of |
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel |
2:2024cv10059 |
January 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Muir on behalf of Social Security, Commissioner of. (Muir, Chad) |
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of New Case Filing to Social Security Administration's Office of the General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. (KBro) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman. (CCie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph E. Houle on behalf of Ebtisam T. Sammour. (Houle, Joseph) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Ebtisam T. Sammour. (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ebtisam T. Sammour against Commissioner of Social Security. No summons requested. IFP Application to Follow. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.