Smith v. Winger et al
| Damien Smith |
| J. Winger, Boykin, Short, T. Page, John Doe #1, Jarrad, Willis, Young and Correctional Officer John Doe #2 |
| 2:2024cv10143 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| George Caram Steeh |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (LSau)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION and ORDER of Summary Dismissal. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Judgment, #6 Memorandum Opinion & Order on Damien Smith Pris. No. 766392 at 4269 W. M-80, Kincheloe, MI 49784. (LSau)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MCho)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $10.00 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (LGra)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Mediation Program (LGra)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Damien Smith. (LGra)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Damien Smith against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Civil Cover Sheet) (LGra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
