Turner et al v. Prospect Airport Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Martha Turner and Kim Turner-Sparks
Defendant: Prospect Airport Services, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv10150
Filed: January 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Jonathan JC Grey
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2024 Filing 9 AMENDED by All Plaintiffs JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN (Cunningham, Michael)
March 12, 2024 Filing 8 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Cunningham, Michael)
February 20, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 3/19/2024 03:00 PM before District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey ***Parties are to file FRCP 26(f) one week prior to conference*** (SOso) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/20/2024: #1 Document Continuation) (SOso).
February 15, 2024 Filing 6 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Prospect Airport Services, Inc. (Danek, Brad)
February 15, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Prospect Airport Services, Inc.. (Danek, Brad)
February 5, 2024 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Prospect Airport Services, Inc. served on 1/25/2024, answer due 2/15/2024. (Cunningham, Michael)
January 22, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Re Issued for *Prospect Airport Services, Inc.* [Attorney's address changed] (NAhm)
January 19, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Prospect Airport Services, Inc.* (DJen)
January 19, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Prospect Airport Services, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9629379 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Cunningham, Michael)
January 19, 2024 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DJen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner et al v. Prospect Airport Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha Turner
Represented By: Michael J. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Turner-Sparks
Represented By: Michael J. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prospect Airport Services, Inc.
Represented By: Brad A. Danek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?