Allen v. Social security, Commissioner of
| Shan M Allen |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of |
| (Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2024cv10186 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Social Security: HIA |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Muir on behalf of Social Security, Commissioner of. (Muir, Chad) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (LHos)
|
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of New Case Filing to Social Security Administration's Office of the General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. (MCho) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Shan M Allen. (Taylor, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shan M Allen against Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff requests summons issued. IFP Application to Follow. County of 1st Plaintiff: Saginaw - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Taylor, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
