Obada v. US Attorney General et al
| Fadhil Obada |
| Attorney General Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Director Christopher Wray, US Attorney General, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of |
| 2:2024cv10338 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Brandy R McMillion |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Matthew F. Leitman to District Judge Brandy R. McMillion pursuant to Administrative Order 24-AO-007. (SSch) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany D. Parling on behalf of All Defendants. (Parling, Brittany) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (LGra) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (LGra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9656157 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits and Exhibits) (Mann, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
