Eastern CR Acquisition Inc. et al v. DeLuso
Plaintiff: Eastern CR Acquisition Inc. and Eastern Wholesale Fence, LLC
Defendant: Christopher DeLuso
Case Number: 2:2024cv10343
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Susan K DeClercq
Referring Judge: Curtis Ivy
2 Judge: Stephen J Murphy
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2024 Filing 14 REPLY to Response re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint with Brief and Declaration In Support filed by Christopher DeLuso. (Satinsky, Rachel)
April 8, 2024 Set Deadlines as to #12 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction In Aid of Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act. Response due by 4/12/2024; Reply due by 4/17/2024. (LVer)
April 8, 2024 Se Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act. Reply due by 4/12/2024. (LVer)
April 8, 2024 Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint with Brief and Declaration In Support. Reply due by 4/8/2024. (LVer)
April 5, 2024 Filing 13 RESPONSE to #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act filed by Christopher DeLuso. (Satinsky, Rachel)
April 4, 2024 Filing 12 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction In Aid of Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Sam Williams, #3 Exhibit B - Declaration of Peter Williams Jr) (Radler, Matthew)
April 2, 2024 Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III to District Judge Susan K. DeClercq pursuant to Administrative Order 24-AO-007. (SSch)
March 25, 2024 Filing 11 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint with Brief and Declaration In Support filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Peter Williams, Jr.) (Radler, Matthew)
March 22, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act by Eastern CR Acquisition Inc., Eastern Wholesale Fence, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Radler, Matthew)
March 4, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary C. Ankers on behalf of Christopher DeLuso. (Ankers, Gary)
March 4, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint with Brief and Declaration In Support by Christopher DeLuso. (Satinsky, Rachel)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Denying #4 Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (RLou)
February 13, 2024 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Christopher DeLuso served on 2/10/2024, answer due 3/4/2024. (Dauphinais, Michael)
February 12, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Dauphinais on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Dauphinais, Michael)
February 9, 2024 Filing 4 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in Aid of Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act and Certificate of Service by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Certification of Matthew Radler Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(B)(1)(B)) (Radler, Matthew)
February 9, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Christopher DeLuso* (KBro)
February 9, 2024 Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Plaintiffs (Radler, Matthew)
February 9, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Christopher DeLuso. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9657044 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Suffolk - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Iredell. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index, #2 Exhibit 1-Stockholders Agreement, #3 Exhibit 2-Subscription Agreement & Joinder, #4 Exhibit 3-Transaction Bonus Agreement, #5 Exhibit 4-Agreement & General Release, #6 Exhibit 5-LinkedIn Post, #7 Exhibit 6-January 30, 2024 Correspondence to DeLuso, #8 Exhibit 7-January 30, 2024 Correspondence to Barrette, #9 Exhibit 8-January 31, 2024 Correspondence from DeLusos Counsel, #10 Exhibit 9-Arbitration Demand) (Radler, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eastern CR Acquisition Inc. et al v. DeLuso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eastern CR Acquisition Inc.
Represented By: Matthew E. Radler
Represented By: Michael J. Dauphinais
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eastern Wholesale Fence, LLC
Represented By: Matthew E. Radler
Represented By: Michael J. Dauphinais
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher DeLuso
Represented By: Gary C. Ankers
Represented By: Rachel Fendell Satinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?