Vance v. Oakland, County of et al
| Karyonda P Vance and Karyonda P. Vance |
| The County of Oakland, Sheriff Deputy James Richardson, Oakland, County of and James Richardson |
| 2:2024cv10463 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Layla Rose Sizemore on behalf of Oakland, County of, James Richardson. (Sizemore, Layla) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor S. Potter on behalf of Oakland, County of, James Richardson. (Potter, Trevor) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert C. Clark on behalf of Oakland, County of, James Richardson. (Clark, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Potter on behalf of Oakland, County of, James Richardson. (Potter, Steven) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *James Richardson* (LGra) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Oakland, County of* (LGra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9685549 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Jarrett, Ernest) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
