Vinarski v. Urban Partition and Remodeling Co
Plaintiff: Barbara Vinarski
Defendant: Urban Partition and Remodeling Co. and Larry R Urban
Case Number: 2:2024cv10688
Filed: March 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David M Lawson
Referring Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 6/4/2024 at 11:00 AM before District Judge David M. Lawson. (See image for document deadline.) (SPin)
April 22, 2024 Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Defendants identifying Corporate Parent Urban Partition and Remodeling Co. for Urban Partition and Remodeling Co.. (Crane, Stephen)
April 22, 2024 Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Stephen A. Crane, Jr appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Crane, Stephen)
April 22, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by All Defendants. (Crane, Stephen)
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL AND STRIKING IMPROPER FILING (TTho)
March 25, 2024 Filing 3 APPLICATION FOR COUNSEL TO APPEAR WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL by All Plaintiffs. (Dubow, Daniel)
March 19, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Urban Partition and Remodeling Co.* (SSch)
March 19, 2024 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SSch)
March 18, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Reinstatement filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9715190 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue, #3 Document Continuation Summons) (Dubow, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vinarski v. Urban Partition and Remodeling Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Vinarski
Represented By: Daniel Dubow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Urban Partition and Remodeling Co.
Represented By: Stephen A. Crane, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry R Urban
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?