Electrical Workers Local 58 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Eminence Group, LLC
Electrical Workers Local 58 Pension Trust Fund, Electrical Workers Joint Board of Trustees Vacation Fund, Electrical Workers Insurance Fund, Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund of the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan, IBEW Local 58 Annuity Fund, Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund and National Electrical Benefit Fund |
Eminence Group, LLC |
2:2024cv10743 |
March 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Sean F Cox |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund, Electrical Workers Insurance Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, Electrical Workers Joint Board of Trustees Vacation Fund, Electrical Workers Local 58 Pension Trust Fund, Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund of the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan, IBEW Local 58 Annuity Fund against Eminence Group, LLC. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9722308 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: Saginaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Kruszewski, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.