Strohmer v. The Kroger Company
Plaintiff: Rebecca Strohmer and Daniel Noveck
Defendant: The Kroger Company
Case Number: 2:2024cv10921
Filed: April 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Terrence G Berg
Referring Judge: Sean F Cox
2 Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/29/2024, Status Conference re Facilitation set for 9/10/2024 02:30 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 9/30/2024 Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/12/2025 09:30 AM before District Judge Sean F. Cox Trailing Trial Docket set for March/April 2025 Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (Refer to image for additional dates) (JMcC)
May 28, 2024 Minute Entry for in-person proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Scheduling Conference held on 5/28/2024. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (JMcC)
April 23, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2024 at 02:30PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (Zaidel, B)
April 18, 2024 Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by The Kroger Company (Miglio, Terrence)
April 17, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Blaine Andrew Veldhuis on behalf of The Kroger Company. (Veldhuis, Blaine)
April 16, 2024 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by The Kroger Company. (Miglio, Terrence)
April 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER of RECUSAL and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Terrence G. Berg to District Judge Sean F. Cox. (SSch)
April 10, 2024 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (MSyl)
April 9, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Kroger Company from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 24-206130-CZ. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9744627 - Fee: $405 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Summons and Complaint) (Miglio, Terrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strohmer v. The Kroger Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Strohmer
Represented By: Daniel Noveck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Noveck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kroger Company
Represented By: Terrence J. Miglio
Represented By: Blaine Andrew Veldhuis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?