New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc. v. Xpress Care Pharmacy, LLC et al
| New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc. |
| Xpress Care Pharmacy, LLC and Cliffside Medical Holdings, LLC |
| 2:2024cv11000 |
| April 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Gershwin A Drain |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Chami on behalf of New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc.. (Chami, David) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A: New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc. General Billing Report, #3 Exhibit B: Motown Xpress Pharmacy Certificate of Assumed Name, #4 Exhibit C: Declaration of Fayez Faraj, #5 Exhibit D: Declaration of Sammy Salem) (Bolos, Sylvia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc. against Cliffside Medical Holdings, LLC, Xpress Care Pharmacy, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9753297 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Motown Xpress Pharmacy Certificate of Assumed Name) (Bolos, Sylvia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
