Baird v. Nessel et al
| Mr. Richard Baird and Richard Baird |
| Ms. Dana M Nessel, Ms. Fadwa Hammoud, Kym L. Worthy, Dana M Nessel and Fadwa Hammoud |
| 2:2024cv11205 |
| May 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss with a Brief in Support and a Certificate of Service by Fadwa Hammoud, Kym L. Worthy. (Smith, Joshua) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss by Dana M Nessel. (Barranco, Kyla) |
Filing 19
STIPULATED ORDER Extending First Response Dates re #1 Complaint,,, (Response due by 6/28/2024) Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (TMcg)
|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Dana M Nessel served on 5/13/2024, answer due 6/4/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Fadwa Hammoud served on 5/14/2024, answer due 6/4/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Fadwa Hammoud served on 5/13/2024, answer due 6/3/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kristin M. Southerland appearing on behalf of Fadwa Hammoud, Kym L. Worthy as co-counsel with a Certificate of Service (Southerland, Kristin) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joshua S. Smith appearing on behalf of Fadwa Hammoud, Kym L. Worthy with a Certificate of Service (Smith, Joshua) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark E. Donnelly on behalf of Dana M Nessel. (Donnelly, Mark) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyla L. Barranco on behalf of Dana M Nessel. (Barranco, Kyla) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed.. (Rizik, Michael) Modified on 5/15/2024 (JPar). [Summons Returned Executed as to Kym Worthy. Served on 5/9/2024] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Kym L. Worthy served on 5/13/2024, answer due 6/3/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Dana M Nessel served on 5/14/2024, answer due 6/4/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed.. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Fadwa Hammoud served on 5/9/2024, answer due 5/30/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Kym L. Worthy served on 5/9/2024, answer due 5/30/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Dana M Nessel served on 5/9/2024, answer due 5/30/2024. (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Fadwa Hammoud* (DPer) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Kym L. Worthy* (DPer) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Dana M Nessel* (DPer) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Baird against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9780428 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: Ingham. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Rizik, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
