Davis v. Borojevic et al
| Caleb Davis |
| Dario Borojevic, JIT Road Transportation and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 2:2024cv11247 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Gershwin A Drain |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S. Groustra on behalf of JIT Road Transportation. (Groustra, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by JIT Road Transportation (Groustra, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by JIT Road Transportation. (Groustra, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JIT Road Transportation from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 24-003044-NI. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9787711 - Fee: $405 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Groustra, Timothy) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (JPar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
