Mboungou v. Chicago Asylum Office, Director of et al
Glodi Yohane MBOUNGOU |
Dir, Chicago Asylum Kenneth S. MADSEN, Assoc Dir, RAIO Ted H KIM, Dir, USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Sec., DHS Alejandro N. Mayorkas |
2:2024cv11323 |
May 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
Linda V Parker |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Glodi Yohane MBOUNGOU against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9798360 - Fee: $405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Ex A - passport, #3 Exhibit Ex B - i730 approval, #4 Exhibit Ex C - Father's NATZ, #5 Exhibit Ex D - i94, #6 Exhibit Ex E - i485 Receipt Notice, #7 Exhibit Ex F - i485 RFE, #8 Exhibit Ex G - i589 receipt notice, #9 Exhibit Ex H - mail out notice, #10 Exhibit Ex I - USCIS online status, #11 Exhibit Ex J - FOIA, #12 Exhibit Ex K - processing times, #13 Exhibit Ex L - i589 delays, #14 Exhibit Ex M - asylum backlog, #15 Exhibit Ex N - 180 day policy) (Sproull, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.