Mbaiarebey v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services Chicago Asylum Office, Director of et al
| Abdias Oumar MBAIAREBEY |
| Sec DHS Alejandro N Mayorkas, Assoc Dir, RAIO Ted H KIM, Dir, Chicago Asylum Kenneth S Madsen and Dir, USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 2:2024cv11951 |
| July 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| F Kay Behm |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Glenn Eric Sproull appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Sproull, Glenn) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9880187 - Fee: $405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Ex A passport, #3 Exhibit Ex B visa, #4 Exhibit Ex C i589 receipt, #5 Exhibit Ex D USCIS online status, #6 Exhibit Ex E EOIR online status, #7 Exhibit Ex F Processing Times, #8 Exhibit Ex G Asylum delays, #9 Exhibit Ex H asylum backlog, #10 Exhibit Ex I 180 days) (Sproull, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
