Dobronski v. Ascendant Holidays, LLC et al
| Mark W. Dobronski |
| Jorge Manuel Bravo Cruz, Juliasangel Marketing, LLC Doing business as 1800travelstogo.com, Ascendant Holidays, LLC, Holidays Lounge, LLC Doing business as Holidays Lounge, Jorge M. Bravo, Holidays Network Group, LLC, Jose Luis Echevarria and Booking.com (USA), Inc |
| 2:2024cv12379 |
| September 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summonses Provided to Plaintiff(s) for Service (SSch) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Ascendant Holidays, LLC, Booking.com (USA), Inc, Jorge Manuel Bravo Cruz, Jose Luis Echevarria, Holidays Lounge, LLC, Holidays Network Group, LLC, Juliasangel Marketing, LLC* (SSch) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mark W. Dobronski against Ascendant Holidays, LLC, Booking.com (USA), Inc, Jorge Manuel Bravo Cruz, Jose Luis Echevarria, Holidays Lounge, LLC, Holidays Network Group, LLC, Juliasangel Marketing, LLC [Fee Paid] (SSch) |
| FILING FEE Received in the amount of $405 by Mark W. Dobronski - Receipt No. 150012069 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (JPar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
