McGore v. Nessel et al
Darryl McGore |
Dana Nessel, Webberman, Alvin C. Sallen, Gerald B. Sherman and Kim L. Worthy |
2:2024cv12656 |
October 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
David M Lawson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
No cause code entered |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Referring Matters for Full Pretrial to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and #6 Order Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge on Darryl McGore 142739 at MACOMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 34625 26 MILE ROAD, LENOX TOWNSHIP, MI 48048. (SPin) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (LGra) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Mediation Program (MCho) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Darryl McGore. (MCho) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darryl McGore against Dana Nessel, Alvin C. Sallen, Gerald B. Sherman, Webberman, Kim L. Worthy (MCho) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/11/2024: #1 Civil Coversheet) (MCho). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.