Doe 1 et al v. Weiss et al
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 |
Matthew Weiss, Regents of the University of Michigan, University of Michigan and Keffer Development Services, LLC |
2:2025cv10806 |
March 21, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Mark A Goldsmith |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Order to Maintain Pseudonyms by All Plaintiffs. (Stinar, Parker) |
![]() |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Matthew Weiss* (LHam) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *University of Michigan* (LHam) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Regents of the University of Michigan* (LHam) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Keffer Development Services, LLC* (LHam) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LHam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10167469 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Stinar, Parker) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.