Thompson v. Chapman and Associates, PC
| Andrew Thompson |
| Chapman and Associates, PC and Chapman Law Group |
| 2:2026cv10708 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Susan K DeClercq |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: William B Federman appearing on behalf of Andrew Thompson (Federman, William) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Chapman and Associates, PC* (TMul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10621747 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Berks County, Pennsylvania - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland County, Michigan. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, January 8, 2026 Redacted Notice of Data Security Incident) (Shea, David) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TMul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
