Baydoun v. Walsh et al
| Housam Baydoun |
| Walsh, Dalton and Montgomery |
| 2:2026cv11721 |
| May 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER STAYING CASE and Referral to the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program Signed by District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey. (SOso) [Centrally Printed for Service]
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION and ORDER of Partial Summary Dismissal. Signed by District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey. (SOso) [Centrally Printed for Service]
|
|
Filing 5
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (SSch) [Centrally Printed for Service]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $47.00 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (MSyl) [Centrally Printed for Service]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Mediation Program (MSyl) [Centrally Printed for Service]
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION [Motion] to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Housam Baydoun. (MSyl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Housam Baydoun against Dalton, Montgomery, Walsh (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (MSyl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
