Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. Safe Fleet Holdings LLC et al
| Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. |
| Safe Fleet Holdings LLC, Seon Holdings Corp., Rear View Safety, Inc., Daniel Pulskamp, Tom Brodsky, Tom Gill, Joseph Schechter, Matthew Thompson, Julian Jimenez, Steven Kwan, Seon Design (USA) Corp. and Safe Fleet Acquisition Corp. |
| Clarience Technologies LLC |
| 2:2026mc50413 |
| April 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred to Eastern District of New York. (TTho) |
Filing 15
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of New York. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (JPar)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response re #1 INITIATING MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10687846 - Fee: $52 dollars with Certificate of Service filed by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment 1) (Dakhlallah, Kassem) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Aakash Patel on behalf of Tom Brodsky, Clarience Technologies LLC, Tom Gill, Julian Jimenez, Steven Kwan, Daniel Pulskamp, Rear View Safety, Inc., Safe Fleet Acquisition Corp., Safe Fleet Holdings LLC, Joseph Schechter, Seon Design (USA) Corp., Seon Holdings Corp., Matthew Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Patel, Aakash) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Mark Legolvan on behalf of Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. (Legolvan, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #1 INITIATING MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance. Joint Lists of Unresolved Issues due by 5/26/2026. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2026 at 03:00 PM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (TDam) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #1 INITIATING MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10687846 - Fee: $52 dollars filed by Clarience Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Brief Format Certification Form, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A - A true and correct copy of the current Docket Report for Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. Safe Fleet Holdings LLC, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-03471-EK-JRC (E.D.N.Y), #4 Exhibit B - A true and correct copy of ECF No. 90 from Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. Safe Fleet Holdings LLC, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-03471-EK-JRC (E.D.N.Y.), #5 Exhibit C - A true and correct copy of the document available at https://www.mta.info/document/138441 that was created on May 6, 2026, #6 Exhibit D - A true and correct copy of ECF No. 1 from Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. FleetMind Seon Solutions Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-00528-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.), #7 Exhibit E - A true and correct copy of the webpage https://clariencetechnologies.com/news/clarience-technologies-acquires-safe-fleet-to-expand-safety-technology-portfolio-broaden-customer-reach-into-new-market-segments/ that was created on May 6, 2026, #8 Exhibit F - A true and correct copy of the webpage https://www.safefleet.net/coban/ that was created on May 6, 2026, #9 Exhibit G - A true and correct copy of the webpage https://www.safefleet.net/waste-and-recycling/ that was created on May 6, 2026, #10 Exhibit H - A true and correct copy of the webpage https://www.safefleet.net/school-bus-camera-systems/ that was created on May 6, 2026, #11 Exhibit I - A true and correct copy of ECF No. 89 from Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. FleetMind Seon Solutions Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-00528-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.), #12 Exhibit J - A true and correct copy of ECF No. 90 from Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. FleetMind Seon Solutions Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-00528-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)) (Tauscher, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO NON-PARTY CLARIENCE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO COMPEL SUBPOENA COMPLIANCE re #1 . Response due by 5/7/2026. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (TDam)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Stipulation by Clarience Technologies LLC and Proposed Order Granting Extension to Non-Party Clarience to Respond to Motion to Compel (Tauscher, Michael) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension to Respond to Motion to Compel [ECF No. 1] by Clarience Technologies LLC (Tauscher, Michael) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Clarience Technologies LLC (Tauscher, Michael) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael J. Tauscher appearing on behalf of Clarience Technologies LLC (Tauscher, Michael) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #2 Statement of Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations, #1 INITIATING MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10687846 - Fee: $52 dollars by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. (Amine, Kassem) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kassem Hussein Amine on behalf of Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. (Amine, Kassem) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc. (Dakhlallah, Kassem) |
| Filing 1 INITIATING MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance by Hayden AI Technologies, Inc.. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10687846 - Fee: $52 dollars (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Ex. A, #3 Exhibit Ex. B, #4 Exhibit Ex. C, #5 Exhibit Ex. D, #6 Exhibit Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel) (Dakhlallah, Kassem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
