Graf Miller v. Joaquin et al
| Richard Graf Miller |
| Michael Eric Joaquin and F & S Collectibles |
| 2:2018cv11429 |
| May 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Port Huron Office |
| Livingston |
| Robert H. Cleland |
| Elizabeth A. Stafford |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File a Signed Objection to the Garnishment re: 78 Objection to Garnishment filed by Richard Graf Miller., ( Objection due by 4/6/2020) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 66 Defendants' Motion to Compel Sanctions; GRANTING IN PART 69 Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees and ORDERING Plaintiff's Counsel Scott Smith and Plaintiff to pay $1320.00 in attorney fees FORTHWITH. Defendants are ORDERED to file a notice of satisfaction of this award. (See order for details). Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING 45 Defendant Joaquin's Motion for New Trial; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 52 Defendant Joaquin's Motion for Relief from Judgment and GRANTING 54 Defendant Joaquin's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
