Barlow v. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
| Edmund Barlow |
| Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv13122 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. (Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory R. Neidle on behalf of Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.. (Neidle, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.. (Martin, Eugene) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STRIKING as improvidently filed, (see Rules of Electroinic Filing) re #6 Stipulation filed by Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) Modified on 11/21/2018 (LWag). Modified on 11/21/2018 (LWag).
|
| Filing 6 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. (Martin, Eugene) Modified on 11/21/2018 (LWag). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eugene X. Martin on behalf of Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.. (Martin, Eugene) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STRIKING as improvidently filed #4 Stipulation filed by Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| Filing 4 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. (Martin, Eugene) Modified on 11/19/2018 (LWag). |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. served on 10/15/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (Parker, Brian) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.* (DWor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edmund Barlow against Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6935369 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: wayne - County Where Action Arose: wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Parker, Brian) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barlow v. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edmund Barlow | |
| Represented By: | Brian P. Parker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory R. Neidle |
| Represented By: | Eugene X. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
