National Electrical Annuity Plan v. Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated
National Electrical Annuity Plan |
Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated |
3:2018cv13701 |
November 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Robert H Cleland |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING on #6 MOTION Dismissal of Complaint . Motion Hearing set for 3/11/2019 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING on #6 MOTION Dismissal of Complaint . Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2019 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland IN PORT HURON, MI (LWag) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated (Schwartz, Brian) |
Filing 6 MOTION Dismissal of Complaint by Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Memorandum of Understanding) (Schwartz, Brian) |
Filing 5 STIPULATED ORDER Extending time to file a response to the complaint, ( Response due by 1/16/2019) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated served on 12/5/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Kruszewski, George) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. Schwartz on behalf of Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated. (Schwartz, Brian) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated* (SKra) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by National Electrical Annuity Plan against Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7005022 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Out State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Teledata Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Appendix to National Agreement, #4 Exhibit C - Memorandum of Understanding (2011 MOU I), #5 Exhibit D - Memorandum of Understanding (2011 MOU II), #6 Exhibit E - Appendix of Teledata Agreement) (Kruszewski, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: National Electrical Annuity Plan v. Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: National Electrical Annuity Plan | |
Represented By: | George H. Kruszewski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Brian M. Schwartz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.