Wrubel et al v. Wadsworth et al
| Teresa K. Wrubel, Marilynn L. Peterson, Josephine A. Marion, Karen Fell, Julie A. Ferrario, Shirley Mauiri, Daniel J. Wrubel and Julie Vipond |
| Jackie Wadsworth, IMS Securities, Inc. and Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv10026 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Robert H Cleland |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent AmTrust America of Florida, Inc., Corporate Parent AmTrust Finacial Service, Inc. for Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc., Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc., Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.. (Eckerly, Ashley) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses , CROSSCLAIM filed by Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. against Jackie Wadsworth, IMS Securities, Inc., COUNTERCLAIM filed by Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. against All Plaintiffs by Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Eckerly, Ashley) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley F. Eckerly on behalf of Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.. (Eckerly, Ashley) |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from U.S. Marshal Service of Receipt of Service of Process Documents. (NAhm) |
Filing 10
ORDER for Service by the US Marshal. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (ATee)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' #6 Motion for Service by the US Marshal. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. waiver sent on 1/4/2019, answer due 3/5/2019. (Broxup, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT B re #6 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshal by All Plaintiffs (Broxup, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshal by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Broxup, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT 3 re #4 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award by All Plaintiffs (Broxup, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3) (Broxup, Daniel) Modified on 1/10/2019 (DTyl) [LAST EXHIBIT NOT UPLOADED; ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE EXHIBIT] |
| Filing 3 REQUEST For Service by U.S. Marshal by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Broxup, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (LGra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7051994 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (Broxup, Daniel) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
