Shreeve et al v. Nahra et al
| Linda C. Costopulos, Trustee and Ronald A Shreeve |
| City of St. Clair Shores, Robert Nahra, Nadya Nahra and Chris Rayes |
| 3:2020cv12046 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant To Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Linda C. Costopulos, Trustee, Ronald A Shreeve. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I) (Petrusak, Nathan) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss In Lieu of Answer to Complaint by City of St. Clair Shores, Chris Rayes. (Ihrie, Robert) |
Filing 12
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendants Chris Rayes and City of St Clair Shoes to respond to the complaint, ( Response due by 9/8/2020) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Harold A. Perakis on behalf of City of St. Clair Shores, Chris Rayes. (Perakis, Harold) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert D. Ihrie on behalf of City of St. Clair Shores, Chris Rayes. (Ihrie, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING on #8 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant To Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Motion Hearing set for 10/14/2020 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant To Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Nadya Nahra, Robert Nahra. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A. Nahra State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B. State Court Order, #4 Exhibit C. State Court Hearing Transcript, #5 Exhibit D. Nahra Lower Court Motion) (Beydoun, Hattem) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Hattem A. Beydoun on behalf of Nadya Nahra, Robert Nahra. (Beydoun, Hattem) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Nadya Nahra served on 8/5/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. (Petrusak, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Robert Nahra served on 8/5/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. (Petrusak, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. City of St. Clair Shores served on 8/3/2020, answer due 8/24/2020. (Petrusak, Nathan) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Chris Rayes served on 8/3/2020, answer due 8/24/2020. (Petrusak, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *City of St. Clair Shores, Nadya Nahra, Robert Nahra, Chris Rayes* (SKra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7958282 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: Macomb County Circuit Court, 19-148-CH, Judge Michael E. Servitto] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Petrusak, Nathan) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
