Northwood, Inc. v. Clinical Wound Solutions, LLC
| Northwood, Inc. |
| Clinical Wound Solutions, LLC |
| 3:2020cv13356 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Robert H. Cleland: Telephonic Status Conference held on 2/12/2021. Disposition: Order to be Entered (LWag)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Submit Stipulation and Setting Telephonic Continuance., ( TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 2/12/2021 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Robert H. Cleland: Telephonic Status Conference held on 1/29/2021 (LWag)
|
|
Filing 8
RE-NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Status Conference set for 1/29/2021 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (CALL IN INFO TO BE EMAILED TO COUNSEL) (LWag)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Northwood, Inc. (Fasse, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 1/27/2021 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying in part #2 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO, Directing Plaintiff to Complete Service by 1/11/2021 and Setting Telephone Conference for 1/27/2021. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued for *Clinical Wound Solutions, LLC* (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Brandon Fasse appearing on behalf of Northwood, Inc. (Fasse, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Northwood, Inc.. (Fasse, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Clinical Wound Solutions, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8235913 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Dupage. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Fasse, Brandon)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Northwood, Inc. v. Clinical Wound Solutions, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Northwood, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brandon Fasse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clinical Wound Solutions, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
