Rhe-Tech, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company v. Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation
| Rhe-Tech, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company |
| Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation |
| 3:2021cv11895 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation answer due 10/22/2021.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation. (Carlton, Clay) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Motion Hearing on 9/22/21 is Cancelled. Case has been resolved. (LWag) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation answer due 10/1/2021.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| AT THE REQUEST OF COUNSEL - Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing re-set for 9/22/2021 03:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation. (Carlton, Clay) |
| AT THE JOINT REQUEST OF COUNSEL - Extending Time for Documents as to #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order Hearing. Documents due by 9/13/2021 (LWag) |
| AT THE REQUEST OF COUNSEL - Set/Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . Documents due by 9/8/2021 and Motion Hearing re-set for 9/15/2021 03:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Robert H. Cleland: Settlement Conference held on 8/27/2021. Disposition: No settlement reached. Parties to continue discussions, All Scheduling and Deadlines remain unchanged. Hearing set for 9/9/21 will go forward unless the court hears otherwise. (LWag) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Clay M. Carlton on behalf of Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation. (Carlton, Clay) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie L. Sweitzer on behalf of All Defendants. (Sweitzer, Stephanie) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Defendants. (MacKenzie, John) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michelle C. Harrell appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Harrell, Michelle) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING IN PART #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Rhe-Tech, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company.,Setting ( IN PERSON Status/Settlement Conference set for 8/27/2021 09:30 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland),and Setting Hearing as to #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction :( Motion Hearing set for 9/9/2021 01:30 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proposed order) (LWag)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation* (KBro) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12) (MacKenzie, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8579516 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (MacKenzie, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rhe-Tech, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company v. Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rhe-Tech, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | John A. MacKenzie |
| Represented By: | Michelle C. Harrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jushi USA Fiberglass CO. Ltd, a foreign for profit corporation | |
| Represented By: | Clay M. Carlton |
| Represented By: | Stephanie L. Sweitzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
