Doe v. Baum et al
| Jane Doe |
| David Baum, Elizabeth Seney, Margaret Gyteko, Chung Owyang and University of Michigan |
| 4:2021cv12492 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Shalina D Kumar |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Robert H. Cleland to District Judge Shalina D. Kumar pursuant to Administrative Order 22-AO-004. (SSch) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response re #7 MOTION for Protective Order to use Pseudonym filed by Jane Doe. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. University of Michigan waiver sent on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #7 MOTION for Protective Order to use Pseudonym and Brief in Opposition filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Kent, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by All Defendants re #11 Response to Motion NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO USE A PSEUDONYM AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION (Kent, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 [ WITHDRAWN AND STRICKEN]RESPONSE to #7 MOTION for Protective Order to use Pseudonym and Brief in Opposition filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Kent, Thomas) Modified on 2/3/2022 (LWag). |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Issued for *University of Michigan* (DAll) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jane Doe against David Baum, Margaret Gyteko, Chung Owyang, Elizabeth Seney, University of Michigan. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Altman, Keith) |
| REQUEST for SUMMONS for University of Michigan. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas L. Kent on behalf of All Defendants. (Kent, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Protective Order to use Pseudonym by Jane Doe. (Altman, Keith) |
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Leave to File an Amended complaint within 14 days and extending time for Defendant to file their response, ( Response due by 2/28/2022) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. David Baum waiver sent on 12/14/2021, answer due 2/14/2022. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Chung Owyang waiver sent on 12/14/2021, answer due 2/14/2022. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Elizabeth Seney waiver sent on 12/14/2021, answer due 2/14/2022. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (TTho) |
| REQUEST for SUMMONS for All Defendants. (Altman, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jane Doe against All Defendants with Jury Demand. No summons requested. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8664789 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Altman, Keith) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
