Bacon v Eaton Corporation
| Jeffrey Bacon and Steve Hebb |
| Eaton Corporation |
| 2:2011cv14103 |
| September 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Ingham |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Lawrence P. Zatkoff |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#99], AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#101]. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
|
|
Filing
89
Opinion and Order Granting Defendant's 73 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Plaintiff's 72 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as Moot and Dismissing Action. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 60 Motion to Compel RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY-INTERROGATORIES.. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Renewed 47 Motion for Conditional Certification of Collective Action, For Disclosure of Contact Information for Potential opt-in Plaintiffs, and to Send Court-Approved Notice.. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 9 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
