Lewis v. Parker et al
| Timothy Lewis |
| T Peiffer, Todd W Durnan, Joseph R Burtch, Soper, Mullins, R Harvey, B Parker, James Armstrong, Patricia Caruso and Millicent Warren |
| 4:2011cv14472 |
| October 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Flint Office |
| Wayne |
| Mark A. Goldsmith |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION and ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion Requesting The Court To Reconsider And Vacate Its 7-31-14 Order Denying Time Extension 69 . Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (JCur)
|
|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 51 MOTION for Order to Show Cause and Order of Reference to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Recommendation Contained in the Magistrate Judge's 46 Report and Recommendation Dated August 16, 2013, Granting Defendant Burtach's 22 Motion to Dismiss and Defendant Durnan's 41 Motion to Dismi ss and Dismissing the 1 Complaint With Prejudice Against Defendants Burtach and Dunran and Ordering Plaintiff to Show Cause, (Show Cause Response due by 10/18/2013). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
