Kaufman v. Corizon Health, Incorporated et al
| Leonard Kaufman |
| Donna Dolinski, Michigan Orthopedic Services, Inc, Aziz Naser, David Greene, Corizon Health, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Inc., Anita Noronha, Karen Rhodes, Haresh Pandya, Brenda Upston, Joyce Hunter, David Smith, Debra Scutt, Lisa Adray and Donna Odell Lajiness |
| 4:2012cv10162 |
| January 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Flint Office |
| Jackson |
| Charles E. Binder |
| Mark A. Goldsmith |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 80 Report and Recommendation Dated February 22, 2013, Overruling Plaintiff's 83 Objections, Granting the 23 Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Corizon Health, Inc., Rhodes and Noronha and Granting the 26 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Scutt, Hunter, Smith, O'Dell, Upston, Pandya and Adray and Administratively Closing the Case. Signed by District Judge Mark A.Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 64 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Defendant Steven Dolinski Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 45 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Leonard Kaufman, and Reinstating 40 Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder. (JBro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
