Pearson v. Romanowski
Petitioner: Jared Pearson
Respondent: Kenneth Romanowski
Case Number: 2:2012cv14816
Filed: October 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: David M. Lawson
Presiding Judge: Laurie J. Michelson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DENYING a Certificate of Appealability, and DENYING Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)
November 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying 3 Motion for discovery; denying 2 Motion for evidentiary hearing. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. Romanowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jared Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kenneth Romanowski
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?