Palmer v. Wayne County Sheriff's Department et al
| Emmanuel Palmer |
| Wayne County Sheriff's Department, Detroit, City of and John Doe |
| 4:2013cv15164 |
| December 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Flint Office |
| Wayne |
| Mark A. Goldsmith |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER (1) Accepting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Dated June 30, 2017 (DKT. 71 ) and, (2) Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. 59 ); (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument(Dkt. 65 ); (3) Rejecting the Recommendation Contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Reco mmendation (Dkt. 53 ); (4) Granting Defendant City of Detroit's Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 37 ); and (5) Dismissing with Prejudice Claims Against Defendant City of Detroit. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Staying and Administratively Closing Case and Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
