Jones v. MacLaran
Petitioner: Curtis Jones
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Case Number: 4:2014cv14205
Filed: October 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Mona K. Majzoub
Presiding Judge: Linda V. Parker
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPINION and ORDER (1) Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; (2) Denying Certificate of Appealability; and (3) Denying as Moot Petitioner's 8 Motion for Expedited Consideration, 9 Motion for Summary Judgment, and 13 Motion for Leave to File Affidavit. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. MacLaran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Curtis Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?