Sagi v. Kubik
Plaintiff: Zeev Sagi
Defendant: Fredrick K Kubik
Case Number: 4:2016cv10347
Filed: February 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Genesee
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Presiding Judge: Linda V. Parker
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (JOwe)
November 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION and ORDER Denying Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss, for Summary Judgment and/or for Abstention. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sagi v. Kubik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zeev Sagi
Represented By: Brian H. Herschfus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fredrick K Kubik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?