Ford Motor Company v. Lopez-Diaz
Ford Motor Company |
Lopez-Diaz and Dianna Lopez-Diaz |
4:2016cv12059 |
June 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Flint Office |
Wayne |
Terrence G Berg |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ford Motor Company (Lintemuth, Elisa) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Ford Motor Company served on 6/11/2016, answer due 7/5/2016. (Lintemuth, Elisa) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Dianna Lopez-Diaz* (DWor) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ford Motor Company against Dianna Lopez-Diaz. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-5726096 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Essex. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Lintemuth, Elisa) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.