Kuerbitz v. Meisner et al
| Arnold Kuerbitz |
| Andrew E. Meisner, William Mann, Wandrie William, Michael J. Bouchard and LNU |
| 4:2016cv12736 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Flint Office |
| Oakland |
| Terrence G. Berg |
| Elizabeth A. Stafford |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 53 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs on Appeal, and DENYING 54 Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Certification of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART 35 Defendants' Objections, OVERRULING 36 Plaintiff's Objections, ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART 32 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 26 Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss, DENYING 48 Defendants' Motion to Stay Dispositive Motion Deadline, and DENYING [29, 31, 47, 49] Plaintiff's Miscellaneous Motions. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Accepting and Adopting 25 Report and Recommendation, Granting in Part and Denying in Part 12 Motion to Dismiss, Denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Denying 17 Plaintiff's Combined Motion for Objections and to Strike Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
