PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association v. Legal Advocacy, P.C. et al
PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association |
Legal Advocacy, P.C. and Norman A. Yatooma |
4:2016cv13258 |
September 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Flint Office |
Oakland |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Linda V. Parker |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 258 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS 248 AND 250 TO INTERVENE Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla) |
Filing 240 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' 225 MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AND RELIEF FROM RECEIVERSHIP ORDER Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla) |
Filing 224 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 218 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla) |
Filing 217 OPINION and ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 213 MOTION COMPEL CREDITOR'S EXAMINATION OF NORMAN A. YATOOMA Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla) |
Filing 80 OPINION and ORDER Denying Defendants' 75 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff shall submit the documents that are referenced in the Opinion and Order, by 10/30/19. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 74 OPINION and ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Denying Defendants' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 43 OPINION and ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER Denying Defendants' 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Answers due by 12/26/2017). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 17 OPINION and ORDER Denying Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Proper Service. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association v. Legal Advocacy, P.C. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association | |
Represented By: | Douglas C. Bernstein |
Represented By: | Patrick C. Lannen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Legal Advocacy, P.C. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Norman A. Yatooma | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.