Christopher v. City of Madison Heights et al
| Justin Christopher |
| Corey Haines, Suzette Gysel, John Doe Officers, City of Madison Heights Animal Control, City of Madison Heights Police Department and City of Madison Heights |
| 4:2018cv12952 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER to Attend Scheduling Conference and Notice of Requirements for Submission of Discovery Plan. (Scheduling Conference set for 12/4/2018 at 11:30 AM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DEADLINE**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Holly S. Battersby on behalf of City of Madison Heights, City of Madison Heights Animal Control, City of Madison Heights Police Department, Suzette Gysel, Corey Haines. (Battersby, Holly) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by City of Madison Heights, City of Madison Heights Animal Control, City of Madison Heights Police Department, Suzette Gysel, Corey Haines. (Rosati, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Response due by 10/31/2018. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Rosati on behalf of City of Madison Heights, City of Madison Heights Animal Control, City of Madison Heights Police Department, Suzette Gysel, Corey Haines. (Rosati, Michael) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Leanna R. Belcher appearing on behalf of Justin Christopher (Belcher, Leanna) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Corey Haines served on 9/26/2018, answer due 10/17/2018. (Gonek, Ben) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Suzette Gysel served on 9/26/2018, answer due 10/17/2018. (Gonek, Ben) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. City of Madison Heights Animal Control served on 9/26/2018, answer due 10/17/2018. (Gonek, Ben) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. City of Madison Heights Police Department served on 9/26/2018, answer due 10/17/2018. (Gonek, Ben) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. City of Madison Heights served on 9/26/2018, answer due 10/17/2018. (Gonek, Ben) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *City of Madison Heights, City of Madison Heights Animal Control, City of Madison Heights Police Department, Suzette Gysel, Corey Haines* (DTyl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Justin Christopher against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6913050 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): 43rd District Court, GZ064081, Judge Keith P. Hunt] (Gonek, Ben) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DTyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
